As I was doing breakfasty things in the kitchen this morning, I happened to notice a Netflix thingie, one of many that pile up on the table because hubbie and I are SLOBS. Oh, what's a Netflix thingie, you might ask? Well. If you've never received discs through the mail, here's what they look like:
The sheet on the left side is essentially an ad for Netflix. You tear that sheet off and throw it away. Or leave it sitting on your table, along with junk mail, until you get sick of it, and THEN throw it away. ANYWAY. I happened to notice the most recent one sitting on the table, and it was basically a reminder that Netflix has zombie movies for you to choose from, since it's almost Halloween. And then it had four DVD covers. I'm guessing this is what they would consider the cream of the crop? The quintessential entries in the genre? Well. Here are the four movies they chose:
Zombieland. Shaun of the Dead. World War Z. AND... AND.... Young Frankenstein.
"One of these things is not like the other..."
Um. I have ISSUES. The most obvious is that Young Frankenstein is NOT A ZOMBIE MOVIE. Yes, Frankenstein's monster is a reanimated corpse, but he is not a zombie. Not in the classic sense of what I consider to be a zombie. Zombies are reanimated corpses who then eat other people and pass on their zombieness. Ol' Frankie could eat people, but he wouldn't pass anything on. The only way Young Frankenstein fits is that it's a horror comedy, and in that sense, it can go fine alongside Zombieland and Shaun of the Dead. Which means World War Z then doesn't belong, because as far as I know, it's a serious zombie movie. But it's a zombie movie and therefore belongs. Dagnabbit!!
The other issue is simply that I wouldn't have put both Zombieland and Shaun of the Dead on the list. They are both excellent zombie movies, but they are outliers of sorts, since they're comedies. I also wouldn't necessarily have put Return of the Living Dead on there, either. Now, if the fourth movie had been Night of the Living Dead, or Dawn of the Dead, I probably wouldn't have given the thingie a second glance. I might have wondered a bit why they'd chosen both Zombieland and Shaun, but I wouldn't be ranting about it.
HOWEVER. I think, in part, what frustrates me about the choice of these four movies is that they're not zombie gore-fests. Yes, there is some gore in both Zombieland and Shaun, but my sister watched them and liked them both. And girlfriend does NOT like horror. Does not like gore. I guarantee she wouldn't like Dawn of the Dead, which to me is THE zombie movie. And from what I've heard and read about World War Z is that it is not a gore-fest. It's more mainstream. AND it's PG-13. The only horror movie I've seen recently that was PG-13 and still good was Drag Me to Hell. PG-13 and zombies just don't go together. We go see zombie movies to see body parts ripped off and eaten. Blood, gore and intestines, oh my!!
None of which is to denigrate Zombieland or Shaun AT ALL. They're just the kind of movies that non-gorehounds would choose if you asked them to pick a good zombie movie. I shouldn't be surprised by this, but ya know. I can be naïve sometimes.
EDITED TO ADD PHOTO EVIDENCE:
That there is the tear-away sheet from a Netflix envelope, inviting the consumer to "add these flesh-eating zombies to your queue." Frankenstein's monster does not eat flesh!!! Jeebus Creezypants!!